In the United States, the republican and democratic parties are the main political parties. Both parties have many and almost the same followers. There are citizens who believe that the terms of each are beneficial to the public and they decide to be neutral. They do not show interest in any of the parties. The two parties have different belief this is what makes them opposition parties. We are going to look at the constitutional republic vs democracy.
Citizens in a democratic country enjoy political education from the government. They learn how the government operates in its daily activities. This form of government safeguards the interest of the citizens in a country, as they are involved in selecting their leaders. The government is keen on the principal of equality as all citizens are equal before the law.
A country using democratic government enjoys the stability of affairs. The citizens are all satisfied by the state of the matter and they are no intentions to change the government duties. This makes it hard to incite the public, as there is no cause for revolution. The stable nature of government leads to growth of the economy.
The democratic government style of ruling has a negative side to it. This makes it less effective in offering its services. The government emphasizes on high figures as quantity as opposed to quality. The government thus uses quantitative method of ruling. The only problem is many people do not prefer this method. This method proves why there are a high number of semi-skilled leaders in a government.
Republican government is another method of governance that ensures fair running of affairs. The citizens give the leaders power to lead. Common welfare of activities is enhanced as both the public and leaders share similar objectives and missions. Nations that use this method have reported prosperity in their economy. The leaders are aware of what the citizens go through and they aim at developing the particular citizens.
In the land where republican is applied, all the people and the government are accountable under the law. The rights of all citizens are recognized individually under the law and not of majority people. When it comes to making of laws in land, the bill is thoroughly scrutinized before passing it into a law. The separation of power makes it easy to monitor all the systems of a government.
Conversely, the republican style has a number of demerits that makes it hard to implement it. The unelected officials have a great influence in running of the government. They influence the decisions made in Supreme Court. At times, the particular government is forced to amend some laws to satisfy the opposition officials. It is hard to amend the constitution as it involves many processes hence consuming a lot of time and resources.
To conclude on the above, a nation needs to incorporate both ruling styles to attain the set goals and standards. The amending of the constitution should involve the whole nation. Charismatic leaders should be elected for effective ruling.
Citizens in a democratic country enjoy political education from the government. They learn how the government operates in its daily activities. This form of government safeguards the interest of the citizens in a country, as they are involved in selecting their leaders. The government is keen on the principal of equality as all citizens are equal before the law.
A country using democratic government enjoys the stability of affairs. The citizens are all satisfied by the state of the matter and they are no intentions to change the government duties. This makes it hard to incite the public, as there is no cause for revolution. The stable nature of government leads to growth of the economy.
The democratic government style of ruling has a negative side to it. This makes it less effective in offering its services. The government emphasizes on high figures as quantity as opposed to quality. The government thus uses quantitative method of ruling. The only problem is many people do not prefer this method. This method proves why there are a high number of semi-skilled leaders in a government.
Republican government is another method of governance that ensures fair running of affairs. The citizens give the leaders power to lead. Common welfare of activities is enhanced as both the public and leaders share similar objectives and missions. Nations that use this method have reported prosperity in their economy. The leaders are aware of what the citizens go through and they aim at developing the particular citizens.
In the land where republican is applied, all the people and the government are accountable under the law. The rights of all citizens are recognized individually under the law and not of majority people. When it comes to making of laws in land, the bill is thoroughly scrutinized before passing it into a law. The separation of power makes it easy to monitor all the systems of a government.
Conversely, the republican style has a number of demerits that makes it hard to implement it. The unelected officials have a great influence in running of the government. They influence the decisions made in Supreme Court. At times, the particular government is forced to amend some laws to satisfy the opposition officials. It is hard to amend the constitution as it involves many processes hence consuming a lot of time and resources.
To conclude on the above, a nation needs to incorporate both ruling styles to attain the set goals and standards. The amending of the constitution should involve the whole nation. Charismatic leaders should be elected for effective ruling.
About the Author:
You can visit www.myamericamyhome.net for more helpful information about Info On The Constitutional Republic Vs Democracy.
RSS Feed (xml)
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu